Anthony Herro, DDS

Anthony Herro, DDS, is a dentist in Phoenix, Arizona. He has 19 years of experience. Prescribing records include medications used for dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public industry payment records show reported payments from pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Anthony Herro, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Anthony Herro, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Anthony Herro, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Lorazepam

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Acetaminophen-Codeine (Generic Name: acetaminophen with codeine)

Prevident (Generic Name: fluoride (sodium))

Triazolam

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Anthony Herro, DDS has received over $1,136 in payments from medical companies (96% less than the average Dentist in Phoenix, AZ)

Solventum Corporation - $23.45 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/17/2024

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $13.89 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/25/2024

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $22.77 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/19/2024

Sonendo Inc - $21.40 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/25/2023

Sonendo Inc - $2.80 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/25/2023

3M Company - $19.16 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/09/2022

ZIMVIE INC. - $16.13 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/26/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $42.82 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/05/2022

Elevate Oral Care - $12.18 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/22/2022

Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. - $14.28 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/06/2022

The most serious concern raised about Dr. Anthony Herro centers on the candor of his dental treatment. The allegation is that the patient's oral care needs were misrepresented, leaving them with severe, lasting pain. The account is brief and offers no detail about the diagnosis, the proposed procedures, or the timeline, so it reads as an impression of the experience rather than a verified finding. Even so, the charge is grave: a patient who trusted a dentist's assessment now describes feeling deceived and living with significant discomfort. The overall tone is sharply negative, shaped by a sense of broken trust and its painful aftermath rather than by bedside manner, scheduling, or office logistics, none of which are addressed. The concern that stands out is one of dishonesty and harm, expressed with strong feeling, and it is worth weighing against how little surrounding context the feedback provides.