C. Ross Long, DDS

C. Ross Long, DDS, is a dentist in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He has 19 years of experience. Public prescription records include medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and gum disease or oral infection care, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public payment disclosures involve pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of C. Ross Long, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, C. Ross Long, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with C. Ross Long, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

C. Ross Long, DDS has received over $146 in payments from medical companies (77% less than the average Dentist in Albuquerque, NM)

Nobel Biocare USA - $14.46 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/17/2023

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $17.28 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/11/2023

Straumann USA LLC - $20.48 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/12/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $27.02 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/10/2020

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $18.12 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/18/2018

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $14.36 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/13/2018

3M Company - $17.66 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/25/2018

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $16.86 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/21/2018

The most notable thing in the available feedback is a brief account of a patient feeling uncomfortable during the visit. The comment gives no detail about what prompted that reaction, so it is impossible to tell whether it came from the clinician's manner, the pacing of the appointment, the examination itself, or the surroundings. Its wording suggests a sense of unease that lingered rather than a passing irritation, and that distinction may matter to someone considering how this clinician's approach would fit their own expectations. Because the reviewer describes a personal feeling rather than a specific lapse, the remark reads more as an impression of how the encounter felt than as a judgment of the medical care delivered. Nothing in the material addresses clinical skill, thoroughness, or results, and nothing touches on the office or its support staff. The general impression is of a patient who left the appointment feeling ill at ease.