Languages SpokenEnglish Common ConditionsBased on the training and education, Chad Baker, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Chad Baker, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats. - Small Teeth
- Poor Veneer Aesthetics
- Tooth Surface Irregularities
- Missing Tooth
- White Spot Lesions
- Black Triangles Between Teeth
- Yellow Teeth
- Worn Teeth
- Mismatched Implant Crowns
- Discolored Composite Restorations
- Aging Dentition
- Outdated Cosmetic Dental Work
- Enamel Hypoplasia
- Stained Teeth From Tea
- Unattractive Smile
- Dark Crown Margins
- Cosmetic Effects Of Enamel Defects
- Buccal Corridor Concerns
- Tooth Asymmetry
- Chipped Teeth
Prescribed MedicationsClindamycin Ibu (Generic Name: ibuprofen) Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen) Penicillin V Potassium Chlorhexidine Gluconate Acetaminophen-Codeine (Generic Name: acetaminophen with codeine) Amoxicillin Lidocaine Payments From Medical Companies(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.) Chad Baker, DDS has received over $675 in payments from medical companies (2 times the average Dentist in Flint, MI) - Over $675 in payments for Education (5 times the average Dentist in Flint, MI)
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 11/11/2021 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 07/13/2021 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 03/09/2021 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 01/26/2021 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 12/10/2020 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 12/09/2020 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 12/08/2020 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 12/03/2020 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 12/01/2020 Overview of What Patients Across the Web Are SayingThe feedback about Dr. Chad Baker leans heavily negative, and its criticism centers on the dentist himself. Concerns raised include poor communication, a chairside manner that comes across as cold, and limited advocacy for the patient, with the commentary framed in pointed personal terms rather than through any clinical detail. Support staff, by contrast, receive favorable remarks, which keeps the reservations about the doctor separate from the front-office experience. Some commentary also disparages the surrounding neighborhood and speculates about the reasons behind his choice of location, observations that do not address the quality of care itself. A closing warning advises against using the practice, but the text offers no visit details, dates, or treatments that would explain that conclusion. The overall impression rests on the perceived manner and advocacy of the dentist, a serious concern that deserves careful weight for anyone considering care with him.
|