Christina Cocozzo, DDS

Christina Cocozzo, DDS, is a dentist in Malta, NY. She has 17 years of experience. Prescription records include medications often used for dental or oral infections. Public payment disclosures involve pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Christina Cocozzo, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Christina Cocozzo, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Christina Cocozzo, DDS directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Amoxicillin

Sodium Fluoride (Generic Name: fluoride (sodium))

Penicillin V Potassium

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Christina Cocozzo, DDS has received over $691 in payments from medical companies (57% more than the average Dentist in Malta, NY)

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $16.21 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/21/2024

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $137.01 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/26/2024

Ultradent Products Inc - $15.91 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/10/2023

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $343.33 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/03/2023

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $12.66 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/02/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $14.44 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/27/2022

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $14.54 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/02/2021

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $49.30 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/05/2021

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $13.47 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/17/2021

Philips Electronics North America Corporation - $14.37 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/17/2020

Patients often describe Dr. Cocozzo's care in warm terms, pointing to her gentle manner, thoroughness, and patience, especially with children who arrive anxious about dental visits. Praise tends to center on step-by-step explanations, close attention to comfort, and a long-standing relationship with the practice. Her knowledge and compassion come up often, as does her willingness to refer patients elsewhere when a procedure falls outside what the office can provide. Set against this is a sustained line of criticism aimed chiefly at the office's administration rather than the clinical work itself. Concerns were said to have been dismissed by letter, frequently without a phone call or explanation, and in some accounts after requests for information went unanswered. Some tie these dismissals to patients declining recommended extras such as whitening or a night guard, an arrangement they felt was presented as a condition of continued care. A specific allegation involves a filling that reportedly discolored and began to chip, with a repair request declined and insurance coverage described as different from what had been promised. Billing disputes and a front-desk exchange described as discourteous also appear in the feedback. The overall impression is that the grievances center on communication and office practices, while the comments about the doctor's own care read quite differently.