David Adams, DDS

David Adams, DDS, is a dentist in Stanwood, WA, with 12 years of experience. Prescription records include medications often used for dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public disclosure records show consulting fees involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of David Adams, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, David Adams, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with David Adams, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Doxycycline Hyclate

Doxycycline Monohydrate

Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass (Generic Name: amoxicillin/potassium clav)

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Diazepam

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

David Adams, DDS has received over $91 in payments from medical companies (71% less than the average Dentist in Stanwood, WA)

Straumann USA LLC - $35.33 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/20/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $16.34 payment for Gift on 02/09/2021

Align Technology, Inc. - $20.00 payment for Consulting Fee on 01/19/2021

Align Technology, Inc. - $20.00 payment for Consulting Fee on 01/18/2021

Feeling cared for is the central impression the feedback leaves about Dr. Adams, and the reviewer's warmth toward him appears genuine and unforced. The praise centers on a sense of personal attentiveness, the kind of bedside manner that makes a patient feel looked after, and it seems to extend to the broader team, though the feedback does not describe any particular visit, procedure, or outcome. That goodwill is set against a sharp and specific complaint about billing. The reviewer alleges that the billing staff member did not know how to submit claims correctly, and reports that when the problem was raised, the response was to say that Medicare never pays for nitrous oxide. The reviewer then describes having to resubmit the claim personally because the staff member said she did not know how to do it. This is presented as the reviewer's account, and the feedback does not explain the underlying coverage facts or what was ultimately resolved. Read together, the review suggests a patient who valued the clinical relationship but was frustrated by administrative handling that fell on the patient to fix. The distinction matters: the criticism is aimed at the billing process and its handling, not at Dr. Adams's care, which the reviewer clearly regards positively. Details about the claim timeline and final resolution are absent, which leaves the billing concern somewhat open-ended.