Devin Davidson, DMD

Devin Davidson, DMD, is a dentist in Provo, UT, with 14 years of experience. Medication records show prescriptions for therapies commonly used in dental or oral infections. Public industry payment records show consulting fees involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Devin Davidson, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Devin Davidson, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Devin Davidson, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Devin Davidson, DMD has received over $340 in payments from medical companies (35% less than the average Dentist in Provo, UT)

Ultradent Products Inc - $7.35 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/12/2024

DENTSPLY LLC - $200.00 payment for Consulting Fee on 09/01/2023

DMG AMERICA LLC - $11.06 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/11/2023

Straumann USA LLC - $12.60 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/29/2021

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $11.32 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/14/2020

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $11.90 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/07/2019

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $11.36 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/22/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $12.62 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/16/2018

Southern Implants North America Inc - $37.53 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/03/2018

3M Company - $13.08 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/21/2018

Patient feedback on Dr. Devin Davidson's practice leans positive when it comes to the everyday experience of care, though one serious concern about a difficult visit stands out. Praise centers on prompt scheduling, work that felt gentle enough to be nearly painless, and a sense of being looked after throughout the appointment. The office manager is noted for patiently explaining details that had been unclear, which contributed to a comfortable atmosphere. Other remarks describe the doctor's approach as intelligent and considerate, consistent with that same impression of attentive treatment. On the critical side, there is an allegation that a visit ran more than three hours, involved a long wait, and ended without the planned work being completed. The same concern alleges that a referral to another dentist was not accompanied by transferred paperwork or x-rays, and it characterizes the handling as unprofessional. These points reflect how the experience was perceived rather than verified outcomes, so they are best weighed alongside the more favorable descriptions. Overall, the impression is of a practice where smooth appointments are associated with a warm manner and clear communication, while the criticism focuses on scheduling delays and on how a troubled visit and records transfer were managed.