Languages SpokenEnglish Common ConditionsBased on the training and education, Erik Sutt, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Erik Sutt, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats. - Dark Crown Margins
- Flattened Smile Line
- Fractured Tooth
- Narrow Smile
- Crooked Teeth
- Loss Of Enamel Translucency
- Excessive Tooth Display
- Uneven Crown Length Appearance
- Cosmetic Effects Of Enamel Defects
- Gapped Teeth
- Mismatched Implant Crowns
- Short Clinical Crowns
- Stained Teeth From Coffee
- White Spot Lesions
- Missing Tooth
- Tooth Surface Defects
- Small Teeth
- Tobacco Teeth Staining
- Tooth Edge Irregularities
- Gummy Smile
Prescribed MedicationsAmoxicillin Payments From Medical Companies(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.) Erik Sutt, DMD has received over $147 in payments from medical companies (82% less than the average Dentist in Harrisonburg, VA) - Over $147 in payments for Food and Beverage (46% less than the average Dentist in Harrisonburg, VA)
Ultradent Products Inc - $26.82 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/06/2024 Henry Schein, Inc. - $31.24 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/07/2022 BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $13.51 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/05/2020 BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $12.42 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/10/2019 BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $12.55 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/08/2019 BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $11.86 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/11/2019 BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $12.77 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/07/2019 BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $26.62 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/16/2018 Overview of What Patients Across the Web Are SayingReviews of Dr. Erik Sutt are mixed, and the sharpest point in the feedback is a complaint that he did not have time for the reviewer, which led that person to advise against seeing him. That criticism concerns the doctor's availability and the sense of being rushed, and it is presented as the reviewer's own experience. Set beside it is a more favorable account, which describes the team as efficient and friendly and includes the doctor and the hygienist in that praise. Read together, the feedback suggests a practice whose staff are regarded as warm and well organized, while the doctor's time with patients is the element that drew a clear objection. The positive comment is brief, so it is difficult to say from it alone how the doctor's manner comes across in the room, though the wording points toward a pleasant, approachable presence. The negative account, by contrast, points to a visit that felt hurried, something a patient weighing a first appointment would likely want to consider. Overall, the impression is of a practice with capable, personable people and a concern about how much attention each patient receives.
|