Gerald Birmingham, DMD

Gerald Birmingham, DMD, is a dentist in Milford, CT. He has 18 years of experience. Prescription records include medications often used for dental or oral infections and gum disease or oral infection care, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public payment disclosures involve dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Gerald Birmingham, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Gerald Birmingham, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Gerald Birmingham, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Amoxicillin

Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass (Generic Name: amoxicillin/potassium clav)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Gerald Birmingham, DMD has received over $619 in payments from medical companies (16% more than the average Dentist in Milford, CT)

3M Company - $32.78 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/20/2022

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 10/21/2021

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 09/28/2021

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 09/21/2021

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $11.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/19/2019

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $14.82 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/05/2018

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $21.82 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/05/2018

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $46.12 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/05/2018

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $14.82 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/02/2018

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $97.59 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/02/2018

Dr. Gerald Birmingham, based on the feedback available, comes across as a dentist whose focus during a visit may have strayed from the concerns the patient came in with. The central complaint is that the appointment did not follow the patient's stated priorities. Rather than addressing the problems that prompted the visit, the dentist reportedly turned to repairing a tooth already scheduled for extraction within a couple of weeks. The allegation holds that the patient's own goals were set aside in favor of a treatment they had never asked for. When the patient requested that a different tooth be examined, the response was a brief refusal, explained by the point that not everything could be handled in one sitting. The tone of the commentary is openly frustrated, conveying a sense of not being heard and of time spent on work the patient did not consider necessary. Beyond this, little is said about the doctor's manner, bedside approach, or clinical reasoning, so the impression rests almost entirely on the account of how the visit unfolded. Nothing is offered about the office environment or support staff, which keeps the concerns confined to how the appointment itself was conducted.