Gregory Senter, DDS

Gregory Senter, DDS, is a dentist in Sacramento, California. He has 19 years of experience in practice. Public medication data includes medications commonly associated with dental or oral infections. Public payment disclosures involve dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Gregory Senter, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Gregory Senter, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Gregory Senter, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Gregory Senter, DDS has received over $214 in payments from medical companies (90% less than the average Dentist in Sacramento, CA)

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $13.84 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/12/2024

American Medical & Dental Supplies,Inc. - $10.00 payment for Gift on 11/03/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $21.10 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/03/2022

ZIMVIE INC. - $38.40 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/14/2022

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $112.81 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/07/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $18.52 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/31/2019

Dr. Gregory Senter is most often praised for being knowledgeable, unhurried, and genuinely warm, a impression that seems to hold for patients who have been with him for years as well as for those who came in only once. Visitors tend to describe a careful, explanatory style in which procedures never feel rushed and patients are never spoken down to, and his light, good-humored manner appears to ease the anxiety many people carry into a dental chair. The most enthusiastic comments center on cosmetic and restorative work, from the lengthy planning and placement of porcelain veneers to ordinary fillings, crowns, and a root canal, with several people saying the results have held up well over time. Denture care also earns warm remarks, including praise for a sales-free approach that contrasted sharply with earlier experiences elsewhere. The front office leaves a similarly positive mark, with staff who seem to make patients feel welcome rather than herding them toward the billing desk. One account, however, paints a far darker picture: a hurried denture procedure, a poor fit, no pain medication, distracted staff, and a claim that the dentist poses a danger. The writer's complaint to the state board reportedly turned up no findings, which they found unsatisfying. Because this is the only critical voice and it offers limited detail, it stands apart from the otherwise favorable portrait, and it is hard to judge how representative it is.