Igor Reizenson, DDS

Igor Reizenson, DDS, is a dentist in Conyers, GA. He has 20 years of experience in the field. Public medication data includes medications commonly associated with dental or oral infections, dental pain, and dental pain or inflammation. Publicly available payment records include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Igor Reizenson, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Igor Reizenson, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Igor Reizenson, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Ibuprofen

Clindamycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Igor Reizenson, DDS has received over $270 in payments from medical companies (46% less than the average Dentist in Conyers, GA)

Ultradent Products Inc - $9.25 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/01/2024

Nobel Biocare USA - $31.73 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/13/2023

Kerr Corporation - $31.72 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/13/2023

Premier Dental Products Company - $35.00 payment for Education on 07/11/2019

Premier Dental Products Company - $14.14 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/11/2019

Implant Direct Sybron International LLC - $12.16 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/20/2018

Implant Direct Sybron International LLC - $65.84 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/15/2018

Implant Direct Sybron International LLC - $47.89 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/15/2018

Peter Brasseler Holdings, LLC - $22.31 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/11/2018

Dr. Igor Reizenson draws sharply divided feedback, and the reviews read less as a balanced picture than as a split between one enthusiastic visit and two strongly negative verdicts. The most glowing account describes a patient who was able to book and be seen the same day and who felt looked after throughout the appointment, with the reviewer also singling out the office staff as especially friendly. Set against that is a blunt warning calling him a terrible dentist, offered without any detail about what went wrong. The most serious criticism comes from a reviewer who alleges that he has accumulated many complaints and poor reviews and who labels him a scammer. Those are allegations rather than documented findings, and they stand against the more favorable experience. Taken together, the impression is of a dentist whose patient experience varies widely, with some visitors finding him attentive and others deeply distrustful of his practice.