James Stuard, DMD

James Stuard, DMD, is a dentist in Magee, MS. He has 19 years of experience in the field. Prescription records include medications often used for dental or oral infections and dental pain. Public industry payment records show reported payments from dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of James Stuard, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, James Stuard, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with James Stuard, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Cephalexin

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Amoxicillin

Clindamycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

James Stuard, DMD has received over $51 in payments from medical companies (52% less than the average Dentist in Magee, MS)

Align Technology, Inc. - $11.47 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/19/2023

Ortho Organizers, Inc. - $24.57 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/23/2022

Kerr Corporation - $15.08 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/05/2021

Dr. Stuard is described as among the best dentists the reviewer has seen, and that high regard sits at the center of the feedback. The reviewer's sense of him rests on effort more than on any single technical point: he appears to work hard to make a dental visit as comfortable and agreeable as possible, which is often the quality patients find hardest to find in this kind of care. That emphasis suggests a practitioner whose manner is attentive and considerate, someone who seems mindful that many people approach dental appointments with anxiety and tries to ease that tension rather than simply move through the procedure. The review is warm and specific in its direction, though brief, so the impression is of a patient who left feeling well looked after and who places Dr. Stuard well above his peers. No criticism of the doctor is raised, and nothing in the text points to concerns about his skill or conduct. Because the review says little beyond this general sentiment, the portrait is naturally one of broad goodwill rather than a detailed account of what treatment involved or how the practice operates day to day.