Jerry Hancock, DMD

Jerry Hancock, DMD, is a dentist in Nashville, TN. He has 19 years of experience in the field of dentistry. Prescription records include medications often used for dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public disclosure records include payments involving pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Jerry Hancock, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Jerry Hancock, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Jerry Hancock, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Clindamycin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Cephalexin

Penicillin V Potassium

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: oxycodone hcl/acetaminophen)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Jerry Hancock, DMD has received over $1,095 in payments from medical companies (24% less than the average Dentist in Nashville, TN)

A-dec, Inc. - $640.00 payment for Gift on 05/14/2024

Ultradent Products Inc - $112.99 payment for Gift on 12/13/2022

ULTRADENT PRODUCTS INC - $112.99 payment for Gift on 11/30/2021

ULTRADENT PRODUCTS INC - $112.99 payment for Gift on 11/30/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $14.36 payment for Gift on 11/21/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $14.48 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/20/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $18.11 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/19/2019

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $13.81 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/25/2019

Premier Dental Products Company - $35.00 payment for Education on 12/12/2018

Ultradent Products Inc - $9.66 payment for Gift on 10/09/2018

Dr. Jerry Hancock is described in favorable terms as caring, empathetic, and highly skilled, with work completed in a comfortable and efficient manner. Impressions of the visit extend from the first phone contact through scheduling and the appointment itself, and that overall experience appears to reflect well on the office team, though the praise for staff is distinct from the praise for the dentist. Ongoing restorative treatment has been described as progressing smoothly, with a crown, fillings, and a clear plan for continued work. Set against these accounts is a serious allegation concerning a root canal that reportedly went badly. According to that complaint, the patient was sent to an emergency room, was advised to have a healthy tooth extracted, and felt dismissed while in severe pain. The same allegation claims a specialist later found substantial infection remaining in the mouth and apologized on the dentist's behalf. These are allegations as reported, and they stand in clear contrast to the favorable impressions. Taken together, the feedback leans toward warmth and competence, while one complicated endodontic case remains a notable point of concern.