Jose Lopez, DDS

Jose Lopez, DDS, is a dentist in San Diego, CA. He has 19 years of experience in dentistry. Public prescribing data includes medications commonly used for dental or oral infections, dental pain or inflammation, and gum disease or oral infection care, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public industry payment records show speaker or faculty compensation involving pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Jose Lopez, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Jose Lopez, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Jose Lopez, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Ibu (Generic Name: ibuprofen)

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Jose Lopez, DDS has received over $252 in payments from medical companies (80% less than the average Dentist in San Diego, CA)

Solventum Corporation - $47.92 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/08/2024

ZIMVIE INC. - $16.67 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/13/2023

ZIMVIE INC. - $94.69 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/29/2023

Straumann USA LLC - $13.53 payment for Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a v on 08/31/2023

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $19.10 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/04/2022

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $20.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/31/2022

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $21.27 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/02/2021

GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. - $19.75 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/31/2020

Dr. Jose Lopez leaves an unmistakably negative impression, at least as captured in the one review available. The reviewer describes him as rude and unprofessional, and says he lacks the interpersonal skills they expected from a physician. Their conclusion is blunt: the encounter was, in their words, the worst they have ever had. Because the text is so brief, it is hard to tell what prompted such strong feelings, and nothing here indicates whether the reviewer's experience reflects his usual manner or a single difficult day. What does come through is a sense of personal affront rather than a dispute over clinical judgment. The reviewer frames the problem as one of how Dr. Lopez treated them, not what he decided about their care. Read on its own, the review suggests a doctor whose bedside or consultation manner left a patient feeling disrespected, and that concern about demeanor is the central point of the feedback. Prospective patients weighing this against other information may want to treat it as a serious perception of how he communicates, since the reviewer presents it as a defining feature of the visit.