Julie Fox, DDS

Julie Fox, DDS, is a dentist in Vero Beach, FL. She has 20 years of experience in the field. Prescription records include medications often used for dental or oral infections and dental pain. Public payment disclosures involve pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Julie Fox, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Julie Fox, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Julie Fox, DDS directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Amoxicillin

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Clindamycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Julie Fox, DDS has received over $114 in payments from medical companies (88% less than the average Dentist in Vero Beach, FL)

Straumann USA LLC - $37.29 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/17/2024

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $22.53 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/27/2024

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $16.13 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/07/2022

Kerr Corporation - $38.97 payment for Education on 09/14/2021

Julie Fox comes across as harshly criticized in the sole review on record, written by a long-term patient who has had extensive dental work over many years. The reviewer describes Fox's manner as cold from the start, noting that she never greeted them during repeated appointments, a detail that appears to have colored the rest of the experience. The gravest complaint concerns a tooth extraction, which the reviewer believes was carried out so forcefully that an abscess formed on the roof of the mouth. According to the account, that abscess had to be lanced three times and was treated with strong antibiotics. The patient has since transferred care to a different dentist and describes the episode as the most distressing dental experience of their life. The review also speaks warmly of the front-office staff, though that praise is separate from the reviewer's account of Fox's conduct and technique. Because the criticism rests on one account, it reads best as a patient's deeply felt impression rather than a full picture of her practice, yet the sincerity of the distress and the decision to leave the practice lend the complaint considerable weight.