Karen Connell, DMD

Karen Connell, DMD, is a dentist in Anniston, AL. She has 19 years of experience in the field. Public prescribing data includes medications commonly used for dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public payment disclosures include speaker or faculty compensation involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Karen Connell, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Karen Connell, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Karen Connell, DMD directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Acetaminophen-Codeine (Generic Name: acetaminophen with codeine)

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Karen Connell, DMD has received over $543 in payments from medical companies (4 times the average Dentist in Anniston, AL)

Premier Dental Products Company - $48.00 payment for Gift on 12/18/2024

Septodont Inc. - $50.41 payment for Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a v on 04/18/2022

Ortho Organizers, Inc. - $24.23 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/15/2022

Align Technology, Inc. - $18.07 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/30/2020

Elevate Oral Care - $10.94 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/17/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $63.00 payment for Gift on 04/24/2018

Straumann USA LLC - $157.00 payment for Gift on 04/24/2018

Straumann USA LLC - $172.00 payment for Gift on 04/24/2018

Dr. Connell's reviewer leaves an overall impression of a dentist who is careful and personable, with the praise centering on her thoroughness and a pleasant manner in the exam room. The reviewer also points to her hygienists as doing good work, which suggests the clinical team's skill is a strength that reflects well on the practice. The closing criticism is aimed squarely at the front office, where a staff member named Denise is described as rude and abrupt, and the reviewer feels that lapse alone is what kept the rating from being higher. Because that complaint is about front-desk courtesy rather than the doctor's own conduct, it reads as a separate issue from the clinical experience being praised. The review is short and gives no sense of a particular appointment, procedure, or outcome, so what comes through is mainly a sense of satisfaction with the care itself paired with frustration at one interaction on the administrative side.