Karla Roman, DMD

Karla Roman, DMD, is a dentist in Eureka, CA with 17 years of experience. Public prescription records include medications commonly used for dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain or inflammation, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Industry payment disclosures involve medical device companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Karla Roman, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Karla Roman, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Karla Roman, DMD directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Ibu (Generic Name: ibuprofen)

Clindamycin

Denta 5000 Plus (Generic Name: fluoride (sodium))

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Karla Roman, DMD has received over $266 in payments from medical companies (60% more than the average Dentist in Eureka, CA)

Straumann USA LLC - $112.08 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/01/2023

Straumann USA LLC - $30.42 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/10/2023

Straumann USA LLC - $17.20 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/23/2022

Straumann USA LLC - $13.36 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/23/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $11.42 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/13/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $25.00 payment for Education on 04/21/2020

Straumann USA LLC - $37.50 payment for Education on 04/21/2020

Smith+Nephew, Inc. - $19.35 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/23/2020

Dr. Karla Roman is portrayed as a dentist whose clinical work earns strong admiration, though her manner, fees, and office practices draw sharp criticism. Praise tends to focus on a calm, professional approach to demanding procedures, with one husband's implant visit described as surprisingly positive and deep root cleaning praised for its care and competence. Finished extractions and an implant bridge are also met with clear satisfaction in the result. The most serious concern is an allegation that a patient was asked to sign a promise not to sue before treatment began, was bluntly told that advanced gum disease and bone loss meant teeth should be removed elsewhere, and only later learned from another dentist that an infection had gone unmentioned. Other criticism describes a lecturing, hostile bedside manner, a fee demanded before gums would be examined, and visits that left some people feeling unproductive. Concerns about the office lean toward staff, with a hygienist described as cold and arrogant, prices called high, and a warmer team member recalled as patient and reassuring. Veterans are cautioned about billing pressure and dismissive front-desk handling when insurance authorization had not been arranged in advance, and the overall impression is of clinical strength undercut by how patients are treated.