Korie Acord, DMD

Korie Acord, DMD, is a dentist in Louisville, KY. She has 19 years of experience. Publicly available payment records include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Korie Acord, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Korie Acord, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Korie Acord, DMD directly about which exact conditions she treats.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Korie Acord, DMD has received over $618 in payments from medical companies (21% less than the average Dentist in Louisville, KY)

Ultradent Products Inc - $76.84 payment for Gift on 08/01/2024

Ultradent Products Inc - $63.59 payment for Gift on 08/01/2024

Align Technology, Inc. - $6.49 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/14/2024

GC America Inc. - $14.52 payment for Education on 04/25/2023

KULZER, LLC - $15.05 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/10/2023

Ultradent Products Inc - $112.99 payment for Gift on 03/24/2022

Kerr Corporation - $101.37 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/09/2021

Benco Dental Supply Co. - $90.78 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/21/2020

Benco Dental Supply Co. - $14.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/21/2020

3M Company - $21.12 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/14/2020

Families often speak warmly of Dr. Korie Acord as a pediatric dentist whose care feels genuinely child-friendly. One family, after trying several other pediatric practices without success, describes finally landing at her office with real relief, praising both Dr. Acord and her staff and noting that the children look forward to their visits. That enthusiasm stands out and suggests the rapport she builds with young patients is a real strength. A second account paints a far less favorable picture. This reviewer describes a family who felt treated unkindly and unprofessionally, and who believes a private matter was raised in front of staff and other patients, despite a long history with the practice. Read together, the feedback leaves the impression that the warmth and connection with children are a clear draw for some families, while the way one family was addressed, particularly in a public setting, was a serious disappointment. The difference between these two experiences is striking, and the second account is the kind of concern a prospective family would sensibly weigh alongside the praise.