Layth Al Kaissy, DMD

Layth Al Kaissy, DMD, is a dentist in Manchester, NH. He has 10 years of experience, and available prescribing records include medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and dental pain or inflammation. Publicly reported payment disclosures include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Layth Al Kaissy, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Layth Al Kaissy, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Layth Al Kaissy, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass (Generic Name: amoxicillin/potassium clav)

Ibuprofen

Clindamycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Layth Al Kaissy, DMD has received over $324 in payments from medical companies (35% less than the average Dentist in Manchester, NH)

Straumann USA LLC - $26.80 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/05/2024

Ultradent Products Inc - $272.98 payment for Gift on 06/18/2024

Straumann USA LLC - $13.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/13/2021

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $11.64 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/19/2018

Dr. Layth Al Kaissy is most often praised for a gentle, professional manner and for explaining procedures in terms patients can follow. Comments describe him as kind, soft-spoken, and especially reassuring for people who feel anxious about dental work, with one theme being that his explanations leave little guesswork about what comes next. Extractions are portrayed as quick and comfortable, and satisfaction with the finished results comes through in several parts of the feedback. The surrounding experience also draws favorable notice: the office is described as pleasant, the staff as friendly and cooperative, and the hygienist as warmly received. Set against that picture is a serious allegation that a root canal went badly. The complaint holds that a file broke inside the tooth and was left there, that an infection developed afterward, and that a healthy neighboring tooth was damaged during a later extraction, leading to substantial repair costs. These remain the complainant's own account and are presented here as an allegation, but they point to a clinical outcome that sharply contrasts with the otherwise favorable portrait of his care.