Lina Albander

Lina Albander is a dentist in Las Vegas, NV. With nine years of experience, public prescription records include medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and dental pain or inflammation. Publicly available payment records include honoraria involving pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Lina Albander? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Lina Albander may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Lina Albander directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Ibuprofen

Clindamycin

Amoxicillin

Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass (Generic Name: amoxicillin/potassium clav)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Lina Albander has received over $640 in payments from medical companies (78% less than the average Dentist in Las Vegas, NV)

Philips North America LLC - $14.33 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/30/2024

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $23.95 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/03/2024

BIOLASE, INC. - $54.93 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/20/2023

Ortho Organizers, Inc. - $21.61 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/26/2023

BIOLASE, INC. - $178.89 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/19/2023

BIOLASE, INC. - $54.93 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/19/2023

BIOLASE, INC. - $54.93 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/09/2023

Benco Dental Supply Co. - $14.25 payment for Honoraria on 05/09/2023

Benco Dental Supply Co. - $19.30 payment for Honoraria on 04/19/2023

Nobel Biocare USA - $23.53 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/29/2023

Dr. Lina Albander leaves an impression that swings between reassuring and painful. Praise centers on a careful, unhurried assessment during a routine cleaning, which uncovered cavities and cracked teeth, followed by fillings that went smoothly, with little waiting and little discomfort, and an explanation that felt thorough. The front desk is also remembered as warm and welcoming. The criticism is considerably more serious in tone. Feedback alleges that an extraction stretched beyond an hour and a half and left the patient in severe pain, that calls to the office went unanswered, and that no prompt visit could be arranged. Central to that account is the allegation that follow-up messages never reached the dentist and that she seemed unconcerned about the patient's condition. Other criticism describes impressions that caused significant pain, with the patient feeling dismissed when trying to explain where it hurt. A separate complaint questions the dentist's knowledge, alleging inaccurate answers and limited compassion. Taken together, the feedback suggests a capacity for strong technical and explanatory care, alongside perceived gaps in responsiveness, pain management, and bedside manner, though the available detail is limited.