Mark Blum, DDS

Mark Blum, DDS, is a dentist in Sunrise, FL. He has 19 years of experience in practice. Prescribing information includes medications commonly associated with dental or oral infections and gum disease or oral infection care, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Publicly available payment records include payments involving pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Mark Blum, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Mark Blum, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Mark Blum, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Mark Blum, DDS has received over $3,115 in payments from medical companies (3 times the average Dentist in Sunrise, FL)

Acteon Inc - $244.00 payment for Gift on 11/04/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $16.57 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/06/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $241.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/23/2021

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $361.50 payment for Education on 09/23/2021

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $241.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/23/2021

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $361.50 payment for Education on 09/23/2021

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $300.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/03/2019

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $450.00 payment for Education on 10/03/2019

SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS INC. - $300.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/03/2019

SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS INC. - $450.00 payment for Education on 10/03/2019

Reviews of Dr. Mark Blum diverge sharply, with the most glowing account coming from a patient who has stayed with the practice since moving to the area about a decade ago. That reviewer describes the dentist as caring, courteous, and highly professional, and speaks warmly of the front-of-house team, who are presented as attentive and welcoming to everyone who comes through the door. The other account is far more troubled and centers almost entirely on money. The reviewer says a substantial deposit was paid before any treatment began, and afterward felt the work was left unfinished or never really started, with most of the deposit retained. Alongside these financial grievances, they question the dentist's competence, suggesting that the specialists brought in to assist seemed to doubt how the case was being handled, and they express their dissatisfaction in deeply hostile language. Read together, the impression is of a practice that inspires strong loyalty in some patients while leaving others feeling financially and professionally let down. The pointed concerns about advance payment and refunds stand out as the most serious claims, and they merit careful consideration in weighing what the available evidence suggests.