Mark Curtis, DDS

Mark Curtis, DDS, is a dentist in Owasso, OK. He has 19 years of experience. Available prescribing records include medications commonly used for dental or oral infections. Publicly available payment records include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Mark Curtis, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Mark Curtis, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Mark Curtis, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Mark Curtis, DDS has received over $412 in payments from medical companies (87% less than the average Dentist in Owasso, OK)

Align Technology, Inc. - $6.88 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/18/2024

Align Technology, Inc. - $42.39 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/15/2024

Philips Electronics North America Corporation - $15.04 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/10/2023

Align Technology, Inc. - $37.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/12/2023

Align Technology, Inc. - $156.97 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/12/2023

A-dec, Inc. - $154.00 payment for Gift on 12/21/2022

Patients most often describe their visits through the warmth and professionalism of the staff, with hygienists and assistants praised for thoroughness, knowledge, and a pleasant manner. Dr. Curtis is credited with attentiveness and with taking the time to explain each step of care, and long-term patients speak of a trust that has grown steadily over years of consistent treatment. Overall, the practice comes across as favorable, with a comfortable, well-organized office and a reputation for keeping appointments on schedule. Set against these largely warm descriptions is a serious allegation that a patient was told tooth decay could simply develop on its own, and that a root canal and extraction were recommended. According to the criticism, a later examination of the same X-ray by another dentist identified a deep cavity that called for a very different treatment plan. The complaint questions whether the original diagnosis was careless, and it stands in sharp contrast to the otherwise positive picture of the practice.