Mark Mortiere, DDS, MS

Mark Mortiere, DDS, MS, is a dentist in Livonia, Michigan. He has 19 years of experience in the field. Public prescribing data includes medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and dental pain. Publicly available payment records include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Mark Mortiere, DDS, MS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Mark Mortiere, DDS, MS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Mark Mortiere, DDS, MS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Acetaminophen-Codeine (Generic Name: acetaminophen with codeine)

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Mark Mortiere, DDS, MS has received over $175 in payments from medical companies (71% less than the average Dentist in Livonia, MI)

ZIMVIE INC. - $15.51 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/27/2022

ZIMVIE INC. - $75.00 payment for Education on 06/15/2022

ZIMVIE INC. - $23.31 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/11/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $11.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/10/2021

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $11.63 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/16/2019

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $30.70 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/16/2018

Ultradent Products Inc - $7.98 payment for Gift on 04/25/2018

Dr. Mark Mortiere's reputation rests largely on long-term relationships, with the strongest impression being one of trust built over years. Warmth, dependable service, and attentive staff come up as the qualities that make the practice feel reliable, and the sense that everyone is treated with the same care stands out as something people value. One longtime patient speaks with real satisfaction about the quality of the work done over the years, while another comment praises his qualifications. Set against that, the most pointed criticism concerns a child's alignment treatment. According to that account, the problem was promised to be corrected, the costs and appointments piled up, and the outcome remained unchanged, with follow-up offering reassurance rather than results. The tone of that account is harsh, and it reflects one family's experience rather than an established pattern. Still, the concern about treatment results and communication is serious enough that anyone considering orthodontic-type correction would reasonably weigh it alongside the more positive descriptions.