Michael Murphy, DDS

Michael Murphy, DDS, is a dentist in Phillips, Wisconsin. He has 19 years of experience in the field. Prescribing information includes medications commonly associated with dental or oral infections. Industry payment disclosures involve dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Michael Murphy, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Michael Murphy, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Michael Murphy, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Clindamycin

Azithromycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Michael Murphy, DDS has received over $808 in payments from medical companies (about the same as the average Dentist in Phillips, WI)

Straumann USA LLC - $34.67 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/13/2024

Straumann USA LLC - $26.16 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/18/2024

Straumann USA LLC - $59.23 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/03/2024

KULZER, LLC - $97.30 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/15/2024

Straumann USA LLC - $25.49 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/11/2024

VOCO America Inc. - $118.40 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/22/2024

Kerr Corporation - $19.30 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/04/2022

Kulzer, LLC - $10.81 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/28/2020

Kulzer, LLC - $88.78 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/22/2020

Henry Schein, Inc. - $41.92 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/20/2020

Dr. Michael Murphy's feedback leans in two directions at once, and the sentiments sit at opposite poles. One note is a single, warm word of approval, implying an experience the writer found pleasing enough to be glad of. The other is a short piece of advice to look elsewhere, which conveys clear dissatisfaction without explaining its source. Because both remarks are so brief, the text leaves open whether they describe the same kind of visit, different concerns, or simply different expectations. Nothing in them touches on the doctor's manner, communication, or approach to care, so any picture of his practice is necessarily thin. The overall impression is of a practitioner who draws either strong approval or strong reservation, with little that sits in between. Read this way, the praise and the criticism stand as two separate, unexplained reactions rather than a settled verdict on the quality of his care.