Nantadla Abinader, DDS

Nantadla Abinader, DDS, is a dentist in Fairfax, VA. He has 19 years of experience in dentistry. Publicly available payment records include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Nantadla Abinader, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Nantadla Abinader, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Nantadla Abinader, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Nantadla Abinader, DDS has received over $67 in payments from medical companies (88% less than the average Dentist in Fairfax, VA)

BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. - $12.33 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/13/2020

Keystone Dental Inc. - $55.51 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/17/2019

Dr. Nantadla Abinader draws a sharply divided set of impressions, with some praise for warmth and competence set against serious distrust, particularly around treatment decisions. Several comments speak to a gentle, considerate bedside manner, describing him as kind, thoughtful, and professional, and one notes that a young patient felt at ease in his care while the work itself appeared neat and well ordered. The most serious criticism, however, concerns whether recommended treatment was truly needed. One account describes a child being advised toward a deep cleaning that the parent felt was unwarranted, and another alleges that dental work caused damage later assessed at more than $11,000, a burden that has stretched across more than a year of ongoing payments. Other remarks are harsher in tone, calling him rude, questioning his experience, and suggesting his fees are excessive, though these are general impressions without supporting detail. A few comments turn to the office itself, raising concerns about shared treatment space and glove handling during appointments, which point to hygiene and setting rather than clinical skill. Taken together, the picture reads as genuinely mixed, with the favorable comments centered on demeanor and the unfavorable ones centered on trust in his judgment and the conditions of care.