Oleg Pen, DDS

Oleg Pen, DDS, is a dentist in Brooklyn, NY. He has 19 years of experience in the field. Public payment disclosures involve dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Oleg Pen, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Oleg Pen, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Oleg Pen, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Oleg Pen, DDS has received over $439 in payments from medical companies (67% less than the average Dentist in Brooklyn, NY)

ZIMVIE INC. - $150.00 payment for Education on 12/13/2023

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $14.35 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/18/2022

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $75.00 payment for Education on 12/14/2021

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. - $100.00 payment for Education on 12/17/2020

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $100.00 payment for Education on 11/11/2020

Dr. Pen's long tenure at his practice appears to be what first drew this reviewer in. After their longtime dentist retired, they chose the nearby office on the assumption that a practice with more than fifteen years behind it was unlikely to be unreliable. The account that follows, however, reads less like a story of reassurance and more like one of growing unease. The reviewer describes a sequence of treatments that left them doubting the work: a root canal they believe was not fully cleared of infection before a crown was placed, a second root canal performed on a tooth whose roots they felt were healthy, and a third root that was never found until a separate endodontist located and removed it. After they declined a planned bridge, they suspect the tooth was over-shaved, and they describe persistent throbbing there since. Office operations draw a milder complaint, with a nurse handling reception and the doctor himself frequently answering the phone. The most pointed grievance concerns money, namely an insurance payment for a bridge the reviewer says was never performed and was not refunded. These are the reviewer's own allegations, and no other perspective is available to weigh against them, but the overall impression is one of serious distrust.