Pamela Anzelc, DDS

Pamela Anzelc, DDS, is a dentist in Portland, ME. She has 19 years of experience in the field. Public prescribing data includes medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and gum disease or oral infection care, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Publicly reported payment disclosures include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Pamela Anzelc, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Pamela Anzelc, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Pamela Anzelc, DDS directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Penicillin V Potassium

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Pamela Anzelc, DDS has received over $2,064 in payments from medical companies (14% less than the average Dentist in Portland, ME)

Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC - $210.57 payment for Education on 07/09/2024

Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC - $149.65 payment for Education on 07/13/2023

Ultradent Products Inc - $168.53 payment for Gift on 07/06/2023

Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co., LLC - $95.32 payment for Education on 02/01/2023

Ultradent Products Inc - $43.45 payment for Gift on 07/21/2022

Ultradent Products Inc - $168.53 payment for Gift on 07/21/2022

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $149.50 payment for Education on 11/14/2020

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $100.00 payment for Education on 11/11/2020

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $20.24 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/02/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $150.00 payment for Education on 09/20/2019

Dr. Anzelc's reviews describe dental care that feels warm, skilled, and attentive, with one complaint about insurance standing apart from the rest. One long-time patient traces a seven-year relationship through veneers, composite fillings, replacements, and whitening, and reports that the results have held up well, leaving a smile that looks better than it ever has. Another experience centers on aging restorations: the patient was glad to have several older fillings replaced and described the change in lively, appreciative terms. Unhurried explanations seem to be a notable part of that visit as well. A third account begins with a badly neglected mouth and stresses the lack of judgment; instead of lecturing, the dentist proposed a plan the patient could manage, and the rebuilding is progressing gradually. Staff are praised across the reviews, though that warmth appears to accompany the clinical experiences rather than form part of them. The critical review focuses on insurance rather than treatment. The reviewer recalls being told that coverage had been verified, only to learn later that the insurer did not accept the verification method used, leaving the full cost with the patient. That same reviewer calls the clinical work appropriate, so the frustration seems tied to how benefits were communicated rather than to the quality of care. The material does not describe the office's verification process, so how the lapse happened remains unclear.