Payam Abedi, DDS

Payam Abedi, DDS, is a dentist in Scottsdale, AZ. He has 20 years of experience in the field. Prescribing information includes medications commonly associated with gum disease or oral infection care, dental or oral infections, and dental pain, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Public payment disclosures show several professional activity categories, including charitable contributions involving pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Payam Abedi, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Payam Abedi, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Payam Abedi, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Amoxicillin

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Acetaminophen-Codeine (Generic Name: acetaminophen with codeine)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Payam Abedi, DDS has received over $34,753 in payments from medical companies (4 times the average Dentist in Scottsdale, AZ)

Keystone Dental Inc. - $107.36 payment for Entertainment on 05/26/2023

Keystone Dental Inc. - $29.80 payment for Entertainment on 03/13/2023

Align Technology, Inc. - $14.29 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/02/2023

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $19.28 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/30/2022

BIOLASE, INC. - $13.74 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/05/2022

Align Technology, Inc. - $29.46 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/16/2022

Straumann USA LLC - $75.39 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/23/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $29.45 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/05/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $49.09 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/04/2021

Straumann USA LLC - $64.75 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/24/2021

The most prominent theme in the feedback concerns a scheduling breakdown that left the reviewer frustrated. The appointment itself was not handled smoothly, and the reviewer describes being passed between offices, with one side placing blame on the other. The reviewer also notes that the doctor was in surgery at the time, which the reviewer reads as a sign of weak communication between the practice and the patient. The impression left is that the failure was logistical rather than clinical, since nothing in the text speaks to the quality of the doctor's care or judgment. The sharpest criticism is aimed at the administrative staff: the reviewer alleges that the staff member showed no regret for the mix-up and did not offer to rebook. Taken together, the reviewer's experience reads as one of being let down by the office's handling of the visit, and the decision to seek care elsewhere reflects that disappointment.