Qing Ming Chen, DMD

Qing Ming Chen, DMD, is a dentist in Charlotte, NC, with 17 years of experience. Public prescribing data includes medications commonly used for dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain or inflammation, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Industry payment disclosures involve dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Qing Ming Chen, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Qing Ming Chen, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Qing Ming Chen, DMD directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Amoxicillin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Ibuprofen

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Qing Ming Chen, DMD has received over $1,675 in payments from medical companies (3 times the average Dentist in Charlotte, NC)

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $20.12 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/08/2023

Straumann USA LLC - $50.00 payment for Education on 12/12/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $41.83 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/05/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $14.02 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/05/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $21.69 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/05/2022

Nobel Biocare USA - $12.99 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/09/2022

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $300.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/03/2019

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. - $450.00 payment for Education on 10/03/2019

SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS INC. - $300.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/03/2019

SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS INC. - $450.00 payment for Education on 10/03/2019

Opinions about Dr. Qing Ming Chen are sharply divided, with the most favorable reflections centering on long-term trust and a patient-first approach. Some describe a relationship that has endured for more than five years, defined by candid recommendations and an impression that concern for patient wellbeing was sincere. The same experience points to a friendly front office willing to find workable solutions, including a discount and flexible payment arrangements for a patient lacking dental insurance. Other commentary credits the doctor with solid clinical skill, yet raises concern that treatment suggestions tend toward costly options such as implants and crowns, which may be out of reach for some patients. Praise for in-office crown fabrication, which can shorten the timeline of care, sits alongside that worry about expense. The most serious criticism takes the form of allegations that an irreversible, invasive procedure was carried out without adequate explanation or written consent, and that questions about it were met with arrogance rather than acknowledgment. Further allegations describe dental work beyond what was needed during the height of the pandemic, performed without an assistant present, and report lasting harm. These accounts also state that complaints have been filed with the state dental board and remain under investigation. Fuller detail about the treatments involved is not available, which makes these competing experiences difficult to fully reconcile.