Reza Abaei Tafreshi, DDS

Reza Abaei Tafreshi, DDS, is a dentist in Irvine, California. He has 9 years of experience. Public prescribing data includes medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and dental pain or inflammation. Publicly available payment records include payments involving pharmaceutical companies and dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Reza Abaei Tafreshi, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Reza Abaei Tafreshi, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Reza Abaei Tafreshi, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Ibuprofen

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Reza Abaei Tafreshi, DDS has received over $1,049 in payments from medical companies (61% more than the average Dentist in Irvine, CA)

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $367.00 payment for Education on 08/10/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $566.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/10/2022

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $9.67 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/10/2022

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $21.31 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/15/2021

OraPharma, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $20.63 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/18/2021

Benco Dental Supply Co. - $11.80 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/05/2019

Implant Direct Sybron International LLC - $13.28 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/22/2019

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $11.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/19/2019

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $13.92 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/12/2019

3M Company - $14.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/25/2018

Feedback on Dr. Reza Tafreshi points to strong approval for his technical work, with praise centering on crowns and implants completed efficiently and with little discomfort. Advanced imaging is described as supporting care, and the warm office atmosphere and polished professionalism of the staff are cited as factors that put patients at ease from the start. Serious criticism, however, appears alongside this praise. One allegation holds that a treatment plan built around saving a tooth was later questioned after a second opinion judged that tooth infected. Another concern involves a financing amount that rose well above the quoted cost without a clear explanation. Further complaints describe charged remarks, pressure toward extensive treatment that a patient said they did not want, disputes over insurance-related billing, and frustration with how charges were handled after radiographs were questioned. These are the views of the people who raised them and have not been verified. Taken together, the impression is of a clinician whose technical skill and efficiency are widely admired, while concerns about finances, communication, and manner have left some patients with a far less satisfying experience.