Stanley Armstrong, DMD

Stanley Armstrong, DMD, is a dentist in Windham, ME, with 19 years of experience. Prescribing information includes medications commonly associated with dental or oral infections. Public industry payment records document several professional activity categories, including charitable contributions and medical education involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Stanley Armstrong, DMD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Stanley Armstrong, DMD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Stanley Armstrong, DMD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Clindamycin

Azithromycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Stanley Armstrong, DMD has received over $1,089 in payments from medical companies (6% less than the average Dentist in Windham, ME)

Straumann USA LLC - $25.45 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/30/2024

Straumann USA LLC - $12.51 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/21/2022

Ultradent Products Inc - $76.84 payment for Gift on 07/22/2022

Ultradent Products Inc - $63.59 payment for Gift on 07/14/2022

Ultradent Products Inc - $168.53 payment for Gift on 07/14/2022

ULTRADENT PRODUCTS INC - $304.98 payment for Gift on 07/07/2021

Align Technology, Inc. - $90.10 payment for Charitable Contribution on 06/30/2020

3M Company - $11.14 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/27/2019

Align Technology, Inc. - $21.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/14/2019

Align Technology, Inc. - $36.00 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/14/2019

Opinions about Dr. Stanley Armstrong diverge considerably, though the warmest comments tend to focus on how he cares for nervous or long-established patients. One account comes from someone who described a deep fear of dental visits and found the experience gentler than expected: the dentist was friendly, narrated each step, gave thought to cost while addressing urgent problems, and seemed genuinely interested in what the patient was worried about. A patient of several decades, now in her seventies, described her anxiety easing gradually over years of visits and credited him with a sound recommendation to pursue implants over dentures, along with real respect for his knowledge and character. Against these favorable impressions stands a much harsher and more emotionally charged complaint. That writer alleged that tooth reduction exposed roots, that crowns repeatedly came loose, that decay and breakage worsened, and that the price of further treatment grew out of reach, adding complaints about feeling belittled and about a demand for payment tied to gum care. These are the writer's own allegations rather than verified findings, and they sit in sharp contrast to the positive descriptions, which is worth keeping in mind when weighing the practice's reputation. Overall, the available comments leave an impression of a practice that some patients feel well served by and others feel badly let down by, with the fuller picture remaining unclear from these few perspectives.