Thomas Abele

Thomas Abele is a dentist in Delmar, NY. He has 19 years of experience. Prescribing records include medications used for dental or oral infections and gum disease or oral infection care, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Publicly reported payment disclosures include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Thomas Abele? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Thomas Abele may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Thomas Abele directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Cephalexin

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Clindamycin

Sf 5000 Plus (Generic Name: fluoride (sodium))

Doxycycline Hyclate

Azithromycin

Dexamethasone

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Thomas Abele has received over $221 in payments from medical companies (54% more than the average Dentist in Delmar, NY)

Southern Implants North America Inc - $28.55 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/03/2020

GC America Inc. - $17.93 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/04/2019

Straumann USA LLC - $175.04 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/23/2018

Patient commentary on Dr. Thomas Abele most often centers on warmth, competence, and a sense of personal care. Praise describes his work as skillful, carefully done, and attractive in appearance, and it portrays him as knowledgeable and professional in his approach. Long-standing relationships come up repeatedly in the favorable accounts, with some describing decades of visits that left them satisfied. Experiences with filling replacements are described as quick and gentle, and the general care provided, from routine cleanings to more involved procedures, is credited with consistency and thoughtfulness. Attention to patients' concerns and the use of current technology are also noted. The staff receive their own warm regard, described as kind, courteous, helpful, and attentive to each patient's welfare, while the office overall gives an impression of efficiency and personal attention. The most serious criticism is an allegation that an extraction resulted in a swollen jaw and a week of pain, along with a complaint that the office's explanation of the outcome was vague. Less specific remarks question his manner, but these read as personal impressions rather than clinical concerns. Further detail about the individual procedures described is not available.