Thomas Allen, DDS

Thomas Allen, DDS, is a dentist in Salt Lake City, Utah. He has 19 years of experience in the field. Public medication data includes medications commonly associated with dental or oral infections, gum disease or oral infection care, and dental pain, including antimicrobial mouth rinses. Publicly available payment records include payments involving dental device or oral healthcare companies.

What is your opinion of Thomas Allen, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Thomas Allen, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Thomas Allen, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Chlorhexidine Gluconate

Amoxicillin

Azithromycin

Tramadol

Cephalexin

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Alprazolam

Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: oxycodone hcl/acetaminophen)

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Thomas Allen, DDS has received over $44 in payments from medical companies (98% less than the average Dentist in Salt Lake City, UT)

Straumann USA LLC - $44.72 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/29/2023

Dr. Thomas Allen's reviews present a sharply divided picture, with one long-standing relationship praised and one recent experience sharply criticized. A patient who has been seeing the practice for more than a decade describes consistent satisfaction with the work and recommends it readily to friends and colleagues, suggesting a durable, trusted dental relationship. The other review, though, centers on a different and serious complaint: a repair to a child's broken tooth reportedly failed within about a month, with the same area breaking again. That reviewer also alleges that insurance information given to the office in November never reached the correct billing destination, leaving the family with continued bills despite confirming Dr. Allen was the listed provider for that visit. Most of the frustration in that account is directed at the front office rather than the doctor, including a receptionist described as rude, a billing contact who was unavailable, and a call that ended abruptly. Because the reviewer is a physician and frames the grievance in those terms, the criticism reads as a pointed judgment about how patients were treated. Taken together, the feedback suggests a dentist with loyal long-term patients, alongside a reported lapse in clinical outcome and in billing and staff responsiveness.