William Hensley, DDS

William Hensley, DDS, is a dentist in Cookeville, TN, with 17 years of experience. Available prescribing records include medications commonly used for dental or oral infections and dental pain.

What is your opinion of William Hensley, DDS? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, William Hensley, DDS may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with William Hensley, DDS directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Amoxicillin

Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

Clindamycin

Azithromycin

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

William Hensley, DDS has received over $570 in payments from medical companies (16% less than the average Dentist in Cookeville, TN)

Ultradent Products Inc - $12.24 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/11/2024

Ultradent Products Inc - $112.99 payment for Gift on 11/06/2023

Ultradent Products Inc - $112.99 payment for Gift on 06/05/2023

Ultradent Products Inc - $112.99 payment for Gift on 03/21/2023

Kerr Corporation - $46.05 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/13/2022

Kerr Corporation - $53.08 payment for Food and Beverage on 03/24/2022

Ultradent Products Inc - $119.99 payment for Gift on 01/26/2018

Patients describe Dr. Hensley's care as warm, attentive, and personable, and a number of visitors express genuine eagerness to return for future appointments. Praise centers on a same-day repair of a broken front tooth, which the office arranged on short notice; the dentist and his assistant completed the work before the day ended, and the patient left pleased with how swiftly the matter was handled. Commendation also extends to the practice as a whole, touching on the staff, the quality of clinical work, and an inviting office setting. The criticism takes a notably harsher tone. It alleges overbilling, along with a sense of being blamed when a billing error was raised, followed by the termination of the practice's insurance arrangement with the patient. A separate allegation concerns a crown that reportedly failed within a year, requiring a root canal, with a replacement at no charge offered only afterward. The same account contends that the original crown was poorly made, and it reports that the dentist who later performed the root canal voiced a similar view. The available material does not show how these disputes were resolved, so the overall impression rests on these accounts, which center on billing and restorative work rather than routine day-to-day care.