Dr. Skyler Maher, MD

Dr. Skyler Maher is a dermatologist in Galveston, TX, with 10 years of experience. He graduated from the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in 2016. Available prescribing data includes medications commonly prescribed for inflammatory skin conditions, fungal skin conditions, acne or rosacea, and acne. Public industry payment records show reported payments from pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, and dermatology-focused pharmaceutical companies.

What is your opinion of Dr. Skyler Maher, MD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Dr. Skyler Maher, MD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Dr. Skyler Maher, MD directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Triamcinolone Acetonide

Ketoconazole

Fluocinonide

Clobetasol Propionate

Hydrocortisone

Doxycycline Hyclate

Mupirocin

Doxycycline Monohydrate

Hydroxyzine

Metronidazole

Based on the training and education, Dr. Skyler Maher, MD may perform the following treatments. Please always check with Dr. Skyler Maher, MD directly about which exact treatments he offers.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Dr. Skyler Maher, MD has received over $415 in payments from medical companies (85% less than the average Dermatologist in Galveston, TX)

Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. - $85.47 payment for Education on 08/09/2024

ABBVIE INC. - $86.02 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/20/2022

Janssen Biotech, Inc. - $18.83 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/03/2020

AbbVie, Inc. - $108.56 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/21/2018

AbbVie, Inc. - $116.49 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/27/2018

Visits with Dr. Maher often leave patients with an impression of care that feels unhurried and considerate, with time given to talking through skin concerns and explaining what was found. Her approach is described as thorough in treatment, and the staff are remembered as friendly and knowledgeable, lending the overall experience a generally positive tone. Set against this is a sharper complaint centered on one appointment, in which the examination was described as brief, the principal concern was left unresolved, and a request to remove areas causing discomfort was not carried out. The concern raised is that thoroughness fell short in that visit, and the person conveyed an intention to seek a fuller evaluation elsewhere. Because this criticism rests on a single described appointment, it reads better as a serious concern about thoroughness than as a settled pattern, though it stands in noticeable contrast to the otherwise attentive picture of her practice.