Dr. Victor Nava, MD

Dr. Victor Nava is a plastic surgeon in Roseville, California. He has 19 years of experience. Publicly available payment records include payments involving pharmaceutical companies.

What is your opinion of Dr. Victor Nava, MD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Dr. Victor Nava, MD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Dr. Victor Nava, MD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Naproxen

Omeprazole

Constulose (Generic Name: lactulose)

Amitiza (Generic Name: lubiprostone)

Tramadol

Movantik (Generic Name: naloxegol oxalate)

Based on the training and education, Dr. Victor Nava, MD may perform the following treatments. Please always check with Dr. Victor Nava, MD directly about which exact treatments he offers.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Dr. Victor Nava, MD has received over $452 in payments from medical companies (93% less than the average Plastic Surgeon in Roseville, CA)

ABBVIE INC. - $30.84 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/14/2023

Allergan Inc. - $10.83 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/19/2019

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation - $19.21 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/06/2019

Amgen Inc. - $21.32 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/23/2019

Shionogi Inc - $10.94 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/16/2019

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation - $11.03 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/02/2019

Daiichi Sankyo Inc. - $20.77 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/16/2018

Daiichi Sankyo Inc. - $22.67 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/07/2018

Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC - $16.65 payment for Food and Beverage on 12/05/2018

PFIZER INC. - $13.46 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/13/2018

Feedback on Dr. Victor Nava leans toward the favorable, with the most straightforward praise describing his care in glowing terms and conveying a broadly positive impression of how he approaches patients. Criticism, however, centers on his communication style. One allegation holds that he tends to deliver reassuring, conventional remarks that bring a conversation to a close instead of offering a candid assessment, leaving the impression that he sometimes wanted the visit to end. The same concern was voiced by someone with medical training, who was confident that the physician had not always been fully truthful, while also granting that his bedside manner compares somewhat favorably with that of some other doctors. Separately, the office itself drew pointed complaints about front-desk conduct. One concern objected to a receptionist's overly familiar way of referring to the doctor as unprofessional, and another described a promotional laser treatment that was not honored at a later visit because it was said to fall outside the agreed window. These grievances concern office staff and administration rather than the clinical care the doctor provides.