Dr. Richard Le, DO

Dr. Richard Le, DO provides dermatology care in Fort Worth, Texas and has 19 years of experience. Prescribing records include medications used for inflammatory skin conditions, fungal skin conditions, and viral skin infections. Publicly available payment records include payments involving pharmaceutical companies and dermatology-focused pharmaceutical companies.

What is your opinion of Dr. Richard Le, DO? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Dr. Richard Le, DO may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Dr. Richard Le, DO directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Otezla (Generic Name: apremilast)

Triamcinolone Acetonide

Enbrel Sureclick (Generic Name: etanercept)

Ciprofloxacin

Ketoconazole

Acyclovir

Cephalexin

Clobetasol Propionate

Based on the training and education, Dr. Richard Le, DO may perform the following treatments. Please always check with Dr. Richard Le, DO directly about which exact treatments he offers.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Dr. Richard Le, DO has received over $1,815 in payments from medical companies (95% less than the average Dermatologist in Fort Worth, TX)

ABBVIE INC. - $16.68 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/23/2022

Amgen Inc. - $13.37 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/21/2022

Amgen Inc. - $97.48 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/12/2021

Amgen Inc. - $18.42 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/07/2021

Amgen Inc. - $8.13 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/17/2021

Amgen Inc. - $8.79 payment for Food and Beverage on 07/13/2021

Amgen Inc. - $8.36 payment for Food and Beverage on 05/17/2021

Amgen Inc. - $15.76 payment for Food and Beverage on 04/19/2021

Amgen Inc. - $9.25 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/01/2021

Amgen Inc. - $11.08 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/28/2020

Care for Dr. Richard Le is discussed chiefly in terms of the exam-room experience, where the central concern is that the doctor's approach felt harsh. The wording of that criticism is brief and leaves much unexplained, yet it conveys a sense that the patient did not feel well treated during the visit itself. Because the complaint centers on how the doctor communicated and carried themselves during the appointment, it speaks to interpersonal style rather than to clinical skill, which remains unaddressed. The overall impression is of an encounter that came across as cold or unwelcoming, a quality that can shape how a visit is experienced even when the medical substance is sound. No praise is offered, and nothing points to what specifically provoked the reaction, so the tone of the appointment can only be broadly characterized. For patients who value warmth and a gentle communication style, this may be a meaningful concern, though it says little about how the doctor handles the medical side of care.