Dr. Broc Pratt, MD

Dr. Broc Pratt, MD is a plastic surgeon in Miami Beach, Florida with 20 years of experience. Public prescription records include medications commonly used for skin and soft tissue infections. Publicly reported payment disclosures include payments involving medical device companies, diagnostic companies, and dermatology-focused pharmaceutical companies.

What is your opinion of Dr. Broc Pratt, MD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Dr. Broc Pratt, MD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Dr. Broc Pratt, MD directly about which exact conditions he treats.

Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (Generic Name: oxycodone hcl/acetaminophen)

Cephalexin

Promethazine

Based on the training and education, Dr. Broc Pratt, MD may perform the following treatments. Please always check with Dr. Broc Pratt, MD directly about which exact treatments he offers.

(These can include payments from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and other companies.)

Dr. Broc Pratt, MD has received over $584 in payments from medical companies (96% less than the average Plastic Surgeon in Miami Beach, FL)

Dentsply Sirona Inc - $17.89 payment for Food and Beverage on 01/26/2024

Galderma Laboratories, L.P. - $22.26 payment for Food and Beverage on 09/14/2023

Galderma Laboratories, L.P. - $12.27 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/27/2020

Surgical Specialties Corporation (US), Inc. - $38.83 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/21/2019

Allergan Inc. - $15.29 payment for Food and Beverage on 06/24/2019

Tepha Inc - $106.75 payment for Food and Beverage on 02/28/2019

Allergan Inc. - $22.69 payment for Food and Beverage on 11/02/2018

Allergan Inc. - $15.34 payment for Food and Beverage on 10/04/2018

Mentor Worldwide LLC - $62.50 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/15/2018

Galderma Laboratories, L.P. - $17.72 payment for Food and Beverage on 08/09/2018

Dr. Broc Pratt is most often praised for his bedside manner, with patients describing him as attentive, clear when laying out options, and reassuring from the first consultation onward. Attention to medical history and personal goals runs through much of the favorable commentary, and a personal call placed after surgery reinforces that impression. Results are described in terms of precision, good proportion, and a natural look. Warm remarks about the office staff, who are portrayed as welcoming and communicative, also shape the overall picture, though those comments concern the team rather than the surgeon himself. The most serious concern raised is an allegation that post-operative care fell short. It describes a one-week follow-up without vital signs or a visit with the surgeon, a blocked drain said to have been flushed back into the body, and unsanitary facility conditions, a sequence the allegation links to a hospital stay for infection. These claims contrast sharply with the otherwise favorable portrayal of care. The available material does not show how, or whether, these concerns were resolved.