Dr. Laura Gardner, MD

Dr. Laura Gardner is a dermatologist in Charleston, SC. She has 7 years of experience and graduated from the University of Utah School of Medicine in 2019. She is affiliated with Musc Medical Center. Available prescribing data includes medications commonly prescribed for inflammatory skin conditions, fungal skin conditions, atopic dermatitis, and bacterial skin infections, including biologic eczema medications.

What is your opinion of Dr. Laura Gardner, MD? Rate this provider below so other people can make informed decision.

English

Based on the training and education, Dr. Laura Gardner, MD may treat patients with the following conditions. Please always check with Dr. Laura Gardner, MD directly about which exact conditions she treats.

Ketoconazole

Dupixent Pen (Generic Name: dupilumab)

Clobetasol Propionate

Triamcinolone Acetonide

Mupirocin

Hydrocortisone

Doxycycline Monohydrate

Ammonium Lactate

Tretinoin

Cosentyx Sensoready (Generic Name: secukinumab)

Based on the training and education, Dr. Laura Gardner, MD may perform the following treatments. Please always check with Dr. Laura Gardner, MD directly about which exact treatments he offers.

Patients who write about Laura Gardner tend to describe care that fell short of what they hoped for, and the concerns cluster around surgical outcomes, the balance between waiting and the visit itself, and how attentive the consultation felt. One allegation concerns a procedure performed during an earlier period of practice in Atlanta, where the incision reportedly went deeper than anticipated and left a scar on the wrist that the patient says is a lasting reminder of the experience. Separately, a complaint describes a visit that followed a long wait and felt brief in comparison, with a requested full-body screening not provided. The same account notes that the patient, who described living with stage 4 breast cancer, experienced hair loss and nail changes and was referred to dermatology by an oncologist. In that account, the advice offered was a basic over-the-counter suggestion, the interaction seemed lacking in thoughtfulness, and the patient felt uncomfortable during it. Taken together, the feedback leaves the impression of unmet expectations and a sense that attentiveness and time spent with patients did not match what was anticipated. The surgical scar allegation stands out as the most serious of these concerns, since it is presented as a permanent result of care. Details about the procedure and its circumstances are limited, so these accounts are best read as individual perspectives on the experience rather than a full picture of the care provided.

Musc Medical Center